LynnBlakeGolf Forums

LynnBlakeGolf Forums (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/index.php)
-   Statement Of Principle (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=140)
-   -   Your Turn To Prove (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6117)

Yoda 01-01-1970 12:00 AM

Your Turn To Prove
 

brianmanzella wrote:

Still no answers....



Below is my response to Brian's quest for "answers" posted on the 24Basic Components / One Ball Location Vs. Multiple thread. It works just aswell here.

brianmanzella wrote:

Maybe if I use another tack, someone will listen.

When Homer wrote the book there was no such thing as sweetspots that all lined up the same.

So, an intelligent person, or a non-biased person can plainly see that Homer could not have put it in the book.

Yoda, I am not talking about the in-line condition, I am talking about the wedge sweetspot lining up the same as the three irons.

So, am I right, does this make a difference that is NOT refered to in the book?



Okay, Brian, you are obviously 'dialed in' on this one.

Interestingly, when I answer your posts -- and bury your personal opinion withscientific fact -- you promptly disappear.

When I don't, you are like the Energizer Bunny.

So, once again you demand my time. Well....

Let's let you do the proving for a change...

The 3-iron is how long? __________________.


The lob wedge is how long? _________________________.


The sweet spot differential is _______________________.

This makes up for the difference in shaft lengthbecause_____________________________________ __________________________________.

If Homer were alive today he would agree with me because, given the above,____________________________________________ _________________________________________________.

I said in a prior post that no Aiming Point change was necessary with my 'oneball location' but now I agree that there must be one because___________________________________________ ___________________________.

Go for it.

 

brianmanzella wrote:

Maybe if I use another tack, someone will listen.

When Homer wrote the book there was no such thing as sweetspots that all lined up the same.

So, an intelligent person, or a non-biased person can plainly see that Homer could not have put it in the book.

Yoda, I am not talking about the in-line condition, I am talking about the wedge sweetspot lining up the same as the three irons.

So, am I right, does this make a difference that is NOT refered to in the book?



Okay, Brian, you are obviously 'dialed in' on this one.

Interestingly, when I answer your posts -- and bury your personal opinion withscientific fact -- you promptly disappear.

When I don't, you are like the Energizer Bunny.

So, once again you demand my time. Well....

Let's let you do the proving for a change...

The 3-iron is how long? __________________.


The lob wedge is how long? _________________________.


The sweet spot differential is _______________________.

This makes up for the difference in shaft lengthbecause_____________________________________ __________________________________.

If Homer were alive today he would agree with me because, given the above,____________________________________________ _________________________________________________.

I said in a prior post that no Aiming Point change was necessary with my 'oneball location' but now I agree that there must be one because___________________________________________ ___________________________.

Go for it.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 AM.